MakoMike
With all due respect, and please don't take this the wrong way, blaming power plants is nonsense. This was a theory heavily pushed by an anti-nuke, enviro scam artist who managed to get some press in the publications (I don't think this one) a couple years ago. Yes, water cooled plant intakes kill fish larvae. But it's important to remember that only a very, very small fraction of larvae grow to adult size to start with. If there is a measureable impact on the flounder population, it is small, and certainly localized. It's quite a stretch to say the least to blame Millstone for the lack of flounders on the South Shore.
As for the problem in general, I find it strange that there are very few small fish. My understanding is that overfishing would result in mostly smalls.
Flounder co-existed with much higher numbers of large bass for a very long time, and bunker aren't plentiful every year, so I have trouble blaming the bass.
Cormorants are flounder eating machines. When did they become so numerous? Is there anyplace that isn't loaded with these birds now? They're a prime suspect for me.
There are more seals now but not so many in the sound that we could blame the north shore flounder decline on them.
I wish I knew the answer. One thing's for sure, we should stop fishing them, commercially and recreationally, and give what's left a chance to come back. Extrapolating from the course they're on, they'll be completely wiped out if nothing is done. I'm at a loss to understand why things like porgies are so overmanaged while flounders are left to go to extinction.
With all due respect, and please don't take this the wrong way, blaming power plants is nonsense. This was a theory heavily pushed by an anti-nuke, enviro scam artist who managed to get some press in the publications (I don't think this one) a couple years ago. Yes, water cooled plant intakes kill fish larvae. But it's important to remember that only a very, very small fraction of larvae grow to adult size to start with. If there is a measureable impact on the flounder population, it is small, and certainly localized. It's quite a stretch to say the least to blame Millstone for the lack of flounders on the South Shore.
As for the problem in general, I find it strange that there are very few small fish. My understanding is that overfishing would result in mostly smalls.
Flounder co-existed with much higher numbers of large bass for a very long time, and bunker aren't plentiful every year, so I have trouble blaming the bass.
Cormorants are flounder eating machines. When did they become so numerous? Is there anyplace that isn't loaded with these birds now? They're a prime suspect for me.
There are more seals now but not so many in the sound that we could blame the north shore flounder decline on them.
I wish I knew the answer. One thing's for sure, we should stop fishing them, commercially and recreationally, and give what's left a chance to come back. Extrapolating from the course they're on, they'll be completely wiped out if nothing is done. I'm at a loss to understand why things like porgies are so overmanaged while flounders are left to go to extinction.