Joined
·
1,679 Posts
Hi,
Considering a duel frequecy fishfinder 50/200khz. The 50 KHZ has a cone angle of 36 degs and the 200 has a 12 deg.
If my geometry if right. Tan (cone angle) X the depth of water = the area of the circle under your boat the fishfinder will see on the bottom.
Lets say I am fishing 300' water.
50 KHZ would pick up fish in a circle 218 Dia (big area)
200 KHZ 12 deg cone would be 64'
So if I only care about what is just under the boat or within a short cast when fishing deep water, why do people say the 50 khz is better in this case.
It appears that the best would be a narrow cone angle and a low frequency for truely deep water fishing.
I now have a 200 khz deg cone transducer and at the same depth it is showing a 42' dia circle which is all I need to see.
?
Capt. Marc
Considering a duel frequecy fishfinder 50/200khz. The 50 KHZ has a cone angle of 36 degs and the 200 has a 12 deg.
If my geometry if right. Tan (cone angle) X the depth of water = the area of the circle under your boat the fishfinder will see on the bottom.
Lets say I am fishing 300' water.
50 KHZ would pick up fish in a circle 218 Dia (big area)
200 KHZ 12 deg cone would be 64'
So if I only care about what is just under the boat or within a short cast when fishing deep water, why do people say the 50 khz is better in this case.
It appears that the best would be a narrow cone angle and a low frequency for truely deep water fishing.
I now have a 200 khz deg cone transducer and at the same depth it is showing a 42' dia circle which is all I need to see.
?
Capt. Marc