Joined
·
27,335 Posts
Obama Practices Looking-Off-Into-Future Pose
1 - 20 of 42 Posts
Joined
·
26,338 Posts
I think that the person that has the most to gain from an Obama presidency is Jimmy Carter. If Obama actually does the things he talks about doing we might actually see things worse in America than they were during the Carter administration and he might actually be replaced as the worst president in modern times.
Joined
·
12,952 Posts
Scott1280 wrote:
I think that the person that has the most to gain from an Obama presidency is Jimmy Carter. If Obama actually does the things he talks about doing we might actually see things worse in America than they were during the Carter administration and he might actually be replaced as the worst president in modern times.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think that the person that has the most to gain from an Obama presidency is Jimmy Carter. If Obama actually does the things he talks about doing we might actually see things worse in America than they were during the Carter administration and he might actually be replaced as the worst president in modern times.
Joined
·
18,491 Posts
I got news for you guys.....These are "SAD"
days for the U.S. right now and there won't be much left for him to destroy anyway.
All he can do is "stop the bleeding", we are too far gone to reverse in 4 years.
days for the U.S. right now and there won't be much left for him to destroy anyway. All he can do is "stop the bleeding", we are too far gone to reverse in 4 years.
Joined
·
4,296 Posts
movetheboat wrote:
I got news for you guys.....These are "SAD" days for the U.S. right now and there won't be much left for him to destroy anyway.
All he can do is "stop the bleeding", we are too far gone to reverse in 4 years.
yes.....SAD indeed. So SAD that you've got millions of undocumented, illegal aliens killing themselves to be part of this SAD, horrible, oppressive, racist, homophobic, environmentally fascist American society we live in. How dare we compare ourselves to those heaven-like Utopian foreign nations?
We need a new image. And a grossly inexperienced, lockstep liberal who can podium pose is just the ticket! He's even got his own video!
kewl.
hey...is that nurse Ratchet? C'mon movetheboat....it's medication time. We'll pick this up later.....
I got news for you guys.....These are "SAD"
days for the U.S. right now and there won't be much left for him to destroy anyway. All he can do is "stop the bleeding", we are too far gone to reverse in 4 years.
yes.....SAD indeed. So SAD that you've got millions of undocumented, illegal aliens killing themselves to be part of this SAD, horrible, oppressive, racist, homophobic, environmentally fascist American society we live in. How dare we compare ourselves to those heaven-like Utopian foreign nations?
We need a new image. And a grossly inexperienced, lockstep liberal who can podium pose is just the ticket! He's even got his own video!
kewl.
hey...is that nurse Ratchet? C'mon movetheboat....it's medication time. We'll pick this up later.....
Joined
·
26,338 Posts
dawnpatrol136 wrote:
movetheboat wrote:
I got news for you guys.....These are "SAD" days for the U.S. right now and there won't be much left for him to destroy anyway.
All he can do is "stop the bleeding", we are too far gone to reverse in 4 years.
yes.....SAD indeed. So SAD that you've got millions of undocumented, illegal aliens killing themselves to be part of this SAD, horrible, oppressive, racist, homophobic, environmentally fascist American society we live in. How dare we compare ourselves to those heaven-like Utopian foreign nations?
We need a new image. And a grossly inexperienced, lockstep liberal who can podium pose is just the ticket! He's even got his own video!
kewl.
hey...is that nurse Ratchet? C'mon movetheboat....it's medication time. We'll pick this up later.....
Double Espresso this morning Tim??
![]()
![]()
![]()
movetheboat wrote:
I got news for you guys.....These are "SAD"
days for the U.S. right now and there won't be much left for him to destroy anyway.All he can do is "stop the bleeding", we are too far gone to reverse in 4 years.
yes.....SAD indeed. So SAD that you've got millions of undocumented, illegal aliens killing themselves to be part of this SAD, horrible, oppressive, racist, homophobic, environmentally fascist American society we live in. How dare we compare ourselves to those heaven-like Utopian foreign nations?
We need a new image. And a grossly inexperienced, lockstep liberal who can podium pose is just the ticket! He's even got his own video!
kewl.
hey...is that nurse Ratchet? C'mon movetheboat....it's medication time. We'll pick this up later.....
Double Espresso this morning Tim??
Joined
·
4,296 Posts
rough night, Scott.
Juicyfruit?
Juicyfruit?
Attachments
Joined
·
6,791 Posts
dawnpatrol136 wrote:
We need a new image. And a grossly inexperienced, lockstep liberal who can podium pose is just the ticket! He's even got his own video!
kewl.
Come on now DP, we do not need a new image....we need change.
We need a President who can change on a dime....and Barak is our man.
He is getting very good at change. Change like we can't believe.
He changed his Preacher, didn't he?
Well as soon as things went bad for him he did...
He even changed his position on Iraq, Iran and Gay Marriage....
We need a new image. And a grossly inexperienced, lockstep liberal who can podium pose is just the ticket! He's even got his own video!
kewl.
Come on now DP, we do not need a new image....we need change.
We need a President who can change on a dime....and Barak is our man.
He is getting very good at change. Change like we can't believe.
He changed his Preacher, didn't he?
Well as soon as things went bad for him he did...
He even changed his position on Iraq, Iran and Gay Marriage....
Joined
·
6,791 Posts
Obama will cut income taxes by $1,000 for working families to offset the payroll tax they pay.
From Obama's blueprint for America..
Maybe he is working on his look so that when this B.S. is questioned he will be able to sidestep it.
Ahhh hem....Payroll taxes are paid by the Companies...not the employee.
From Obama's blueprint for America..
Maybe he is working on his look so that when this B.S. is questioned he will be able to sidestep it.
Ahhh hem....Payroll taxes are paid by the Companies...not the employee.
Joined
·
17,340 Posts
RedEd wrote:
It will be a sad day for America if this pop icon leftie manages to win the White House.
Today is a sad in America Ed.
Unemployment at 27 year highs.
Oil well...
Outsourced future,
Tax breaks for the rich at the price of your kids future in the form of a huge deficit..
but hey it's all about me right?
Live now the kids will pay for it with thier high paying jobs..
Bush II the legacy lives. Lowest approval rating in US history. The 27 percent who love them are right here in the lounge though
It will be a sad day for America if this pop icon leftie manages to win the White House.
Today is a sad in America Ed.
Unemployment at 27 year highs.
Oil well...
Outsourced future,
Tax breaks for the rich at the price of your kids future in the form of a huge deficit..
but hey it's all about me right?
Live now the kids will pay for it with thier high paying jobs..
Bush II the legacy lives. Lowest approval rating in US history. The 27 percent who love them are right here in the lounge though
Joined
·
17,340 Posts
FredyFluke wrote:
Obama will cut income taxes by $1,000 for working families to offset the payroll tax they pay.
From Obama's blueprint for America..
Maybe he is working on his look so that when this B.S. is questioned he will be able to sidestep it.
Ahhh hem....Payroll taxes are paid by the Companies...not the employee.
That's the best you got?
Obama will cut income taxes by $1,000 for working families to offset the payroll tax they pay.
From Obama's blueprint for America..
Maybe he is working on his look so that when this B.S. is questioned he will be able to sidestep it.
Ahhh hem....Payroll taxes are paid by the Companies...not the employee.
That's the best you got?
Joined
·
17,340 Posts
FredyFluke wrote:
dawnpatrol136 wrote:
We need a new image. And a grossly inexperienced, lockstep liberal who can podium pose is just the ticket! He's even got his own video!
kewl.
Come on now DP, we do not need a new image....we need change.
We need a President who can change on a dime....and Barak is our man.
He is getting very good at change. Change like we can't believe.
He changed his Preacher, didn't he?
Well as soon as things went bad for him he did...
He even changed his position on Iraq, Iran and Gay Marriage....
Um er I remember Mcain voting against and blasting the Bush tax breaks.. um twice..
Now..
![]()
dawnpatrol136 wrote:
We need a new image. And a grossly inexperienced, lockstep liberal who can podium pose is just the ticket! He's even got his own video!
kewl.
Come on now DP, we do not need a new image....we need change.
We need a President who can change on a dime....and Barak is our man.
He is getting very good at change. Change like we can't believe.
He changed his Preacher, didn't he?
Well as soon as things went bad for him he did...
He even changed his position on Iraq, Iran and Gay Marriage....
Um er I remember Mcain voting against and blasting the Bush tax breaks.. um twice..
Now..
Joined
·
17,340 Posts
article is a joke.
His real look should be sticking his head between his butt and kissing his ass goodbye because he has no chance the public is too stupid to elect him. And he's black. But I can say that because I am voting for him as he will win NY easily.
His real look should be sticking his head between his butt and kissing his ass goodbye because he has no chance the public is too stupid to elect him. And he's black. But I can say that because I am voting for him as he will win NY easily.
Joined
·
26,338 Posts
likeitreallyis wrote:
article is a joke.
His real look should be sticking his head between his butt and kissing his ass goodbye because he has no chance the public is too stupid to elect him. And he's black. But I can say that because I am voting for him as he will win NY easily.
"Too Stupid to vote for him"?? What qualifies him to be President? Please give us his resume highlights......
I think Thomas Sewell covered him pretty well..
An Old Newness
Thomas Sowell
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Many years ago, a great hitter named Paul Waner was nearing the end of his long career. He entered a ballgame with 2,999 hits -- one hit away from the landmark total of 3,000, which so many hitters want to reach, but which relatively few actually do reach.
Waner hit a ball that the fielder did not handle cleanly but the official scorer called it a hit, making it Waner's 3,000th. Paul Waner then sent word to the official scorer that he did not want that questionable hit to be the one that put him over the top.
The official scorer reversed himself and called it an error. Later Paul Waner got a clean hit for number 3,000.
What reminded me of this is the great fervor that many seem to feel over the prospect of the first black President of the United States.
No doubt it is only a matter of time before there is a black president, just as it was only a matter of time before Paul Waner got his 3,000th hit. The issue is whether we want to reach that landmark so badly that we are willing to overlook how questionably that landmark is reached.
Paul Waner had too much pride to accept a scratch hit. Choosing a President of the United States is a lot more momentous than a baseball record. We the voters need to have far more concern about who we put in that office that holds the destiny of a nation and of generations yet unborn.
There is no reason why someone as arrogant, foolishly clever and ultimately dangerous as Barack Obama should become president -- especially not at a time when the threat of international terrorists with nuclear weapons looms over 300 million Americans.
Many people seem to regard elections as occasions for venting emotions, like cheering for your favorite team or choosing a Homecoming Queen.
The three leading candidates for their party's nomination are being discussed in terms of their demographics -- race, sex and age -- as if that is what the job is about.
One of the painful aspects of studying great catastrophes of the past is discovering how many times people were preoccupied with trivialities when they were teetering on the edge of doom. The demographics of the presidency are far less important than the momentous weight of responsibility that office carries.
Just the power to nominate federal judges to trial courts and appellate courts across the country, including the Supreme Court, can have an enormous impact for decades to come. There is no point feeling outraged by things done by federal judges, if you vote on the basis of emotion for those who appoint them.
Barack Obama has already indicated that he wants judges who make social policy instead of just applying the law. He has already tried to stop young violent criminals from being tried as adults.
Although Senator Obama has presented himself as the candidate of new things -- using the mantra of "change" endlessly -- the cold fact is that virtually everything has says about domestic policy is straight out of the 1960s and virtually everything he says about foreign policy is straight out of the 1930s.
Protecting criminals, attacking business, increasing government spending, promoting a sense of envy and grievance, raising taxes on people who are productive and subsidizing those who are not -- all this is a re-run of the 1960s.
We paid a terrible price for such 1960s notions in the years that followed, in the form of soaring crime rates, double-digit inflation and double-digit unemployment. During the 1960s, ghettoes across the countries were ravaged by riots from which many have not fully recovered to this day.
The violence and destruction were concentrated not where there was the greatest poverty or injustice but where there were the most liberal politicians, promoting grievances and hamstringing the police.
Internationally, the approach that Senator Obama proposes -- including the media magic of meetings between heads of state -- was tried during the 1930s. That approach, in the name of peace, is what led to the most catastrophic war in human history.
Everything seems new to those too young to remember the old and too ignorant of history to have heard about it.
article is a joke.
His real look should be sticking his head between his butt and kissing his ass goodbye because he has no chance the public is too stupid to elect him. And he's black. But I can say that because I am voting for him as he will win NY easily.
"Too Stupid to vote for him"?? What qualifies him to be President? Please give us his resume highlights......
I think Thomas Sewell covered him pretty well..
An Old Newness
Thomas Sowell
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Many years ago, a great hitter named Paul Waner was nearing the end of his long career. He entered a ballgame with 2,999 hits -- one hit away from the landmark total of 3,000, which so many hitters want to reach, but which relatively few actually do reach.
Waner hit a ball that the fielder did not handle cleanly but the official scorer called it a hit, making it Waner's 3,000th. Paul Waner then sent word to the official scorer that he did not want that questionable hit to be the one that put him over the top.
The official scorer reversed himself and called it an error. Later Paul Waner got a clean hit for number 3,000.
What reminded me of this is the great fervor that many seem to feel over the prospect of the first black President of the United States.
No doubt it is only a matter of time before there is a black president, just as it was only a matter of time before Paul Waner got his 3,000th hit. The issue is whether we want to reach that landmark so badly that we are willing to overlook how questionably that landmark is reached.
Paul Waner had too much pride to accept a scratch hit. Choosing a President of the United States is a lot more momentous than a baseball record. We the voters need to have far more concern about who we put in that office that holds the destiny of a nation and of generations yet unborn.
There is no reason why someone as arrogant, foolishly clever and ultimately dangerous as Barack Obama should become president -- especially not at a time when the threat of international terrorists with nuclear weapons looms over 300 million Americans.
Many people seem to regard elections as occasions for venting emotions, like cheering for your favorite team or choosing a Homecoming Queen.
The three leading candidates for their party's nomination are being discussed in terms of their demographics -- race, sex and age -- as if that is what the job is about.
One of the painful aspects of studying great catastrophes of the past is discovering how many times people were preoccupied with trivialities when they were teetering on the edge of doom. The demographics of the presidency are far less important than the momentous weight of responsibility that office carries.
Just the power to nominate federal judges to trial courts and appellate courts across the country, including the Supreme Court, can have an enormous impact for decades to come. There is no point feeling outraged by things done by federal judges, if you vote on the basis of emotion for those who appoint them.
Barack Obama has already indicated that he wants judges who make social policy instead of just applying the law. He has already tried to stop young violent criminals from being tried as adults.
Although Senator Obama has presented himself as the candidate of new things -- using the mantra of "change" endlessly -- the cold fact is that virtually everything has says about domestic policy is straight out of the 1960s and virtually everything he says about foreign policy is straight out of the 1930s.
Protecting criminals, attacking business, increasing government spending, promoting a sense of envy and grievance, raising taxes on people who are productive and subsidizing those who are not -- all this is a re-run of the 1960s.
We paid a terrible price for such 1960s notions in the years that followed, in the form of soaring crime rates, double-digit inflation and double-digit unemployment. During the 1960s, ghettoes across the countries were ravaged by riots from which many have not fully recovered to this day.
The violence and destruction were concentrated not where there was the greatest poverty or injustice but where there were the most liberal politicians, promoting grievances and hamstringing the police.
Internationally, the approach that Senator Obama proposes -- including the media magic of meetings between heads of state -- was tried during the 1930s. That approach, in the name of peace, is what led to the most catastrophic war in human history.
Everything seems new to those too young to remember the old and too ignorant of history to have heard about it.
1 - 20 of 42 Posts
