NorEast Fishing Forum banner
1 - 15 of 15 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
67,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
NOAA Fisheries Service found that the State of New Jersey has failed to implement measures necessary to fulfill its responsibilities under the tautog interstate fishery management plan and which are crucial for conservation of the salt water fish. As a result, NOAA will close New Jersey?s commercial and recreational fishery for tautog on April 1.

Tautog is a popular recreational species whose stock is overfished. Landings data indicate that New Jersey's harvest is significant compared with that of other states, and that its recreational landings more than tripled in 2006. Accordingly, its failure to implement management measures will undermine the interstate conservation plan for the species.

Under the rebuilding plan, each of the Northeastern states are required to reduce tautog fishing effort by about 26 percent over 2003 to 2005 average levels. On February 7, the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission determined that New Jersey had not taken such measures as required by the fishery management plan.

Under the Atlantic Coastal Act, NOAA's Fisheries Service was obliged to conduct a review and make a decision within 30 days as to whether it concurred with the Commission?s findings, and whether the mandated measures are necessary for the conservation of the tautog resource

April 1 was selected for the closure date because it provides significant conservation benefits while allowing enough time to ensure that anglers, commercial fishermen and dealers are aware of the effective closure date.

The most recent landings data from 2006 find New Jersey recreational anglers landed about 700,000 pounds of tautog, and commercial fishermen about 70,000 pounds. In 2006, Northeast fishermen landed about 4.3 million pounds of tautog, most of which was taken by recreational anglers.

Tautog is managed within the framework of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission. The Commission, comprising representatives from the Atlantic coastal states, develops fishery conservation and management strategies for certain coastal species and coordinates state efforts to achieve those objectives.

# # #

NOAA Fisheries Service is dedicated to protecting and preserving our nation?s living marine resources and their habitat through scientific research, management and enforcement. NOAA Fisheries Service provides effective stewardship of these resources for the benefit of the nation, supporting coastal communities that depend upon them, and helping to provide safe and healthy seafood to consumers and recreational opportunities for the American public.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department, is dedicated to enhancing economic security and national safety through the prediction and research of weather and climate-related events and information service delivery for transportation, and by providing environmental stewardship of our nation's coastal and marine resources. Through the emerging Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS), NOAA is working with its federal partners, more than 70 countries and the European Commission to develop a global monitoring network that is as integrated as the planet it observes, predicts and protects.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
67,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
I'm not really sure why they haven't come up with proposals.

JC,
Yes, see what happens when a state "stands up for its fishermen." It's getting an entire species off limit for both recs and commercials. If that's "standing up for its fishermen" I want no part of it.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
6,822 Posts
Kind of interesting, Mike. But really, if the Feds shut down the fishery, maybe NJs tog is the ideal species. They haven't any jurisdiction in the state's waters, and there isn't much of a fishery outside of that. One fishery that both recs and comms spend most of their time inshore. Maybe they feel untouchable.

Paul
 

· Banned
Joined
·
7,215 Posts
CaptPaul wrote:
But really, if the Feds shut down the fishery, maybe NJs tog is the ideal species. They haven't any jurisdiction in the state's waters, and there isn't much of a fishery outside of that. One fishery that both recs and comms spend most of their time inshore.
NJ has 15 artificial reefs.
13 of them are in Fed Waters.

I would think recs spend a considerable amount of their time in Fed water when it comes to togging in NJ,
especially when you consider what time of year the effort and landings occur for that sector.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
7,215 Posts
CaptPaul wrote:
Have you got a take on it?


I was pointing out that its actually the opposite of what you reasoned,
there is a substantial fishery in Fed waters for this species,
which would make even less sense for NJ make this move.

Jersey boys know how to fight for their fish,
so I guess there is probably some larger issue at stake,
and Tog just happens to be the species that the "line in the sand" was drawn.
Thats my guess if I had to make one
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
67,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
CaptPaul wrote:
Kind of interesting, Mike. But really, if the Feds shut down the fishery, maybe NJs tog is the ideal species. They haven't any jurisdiction in the state's waters, and there isn't much of a fishery outside of that. One fishery that both recs and comms spend most of their time inshore. Maybe they feel untouchable.

Paul

Paul, I don't think that is true, I believe that under the interstate compact the states have ceded jurisdiction to the feds in cases of non-compliance.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
67,033 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
CaptPaul wrote:
Could be very well, Mike. But whenever a state goes out of compliance, the only threats I read about are loss of Federally-related permits, and closure of Federal waters.

Paul

Paul,
I noted that above notice doesn't differentiate betwen federal and state waters. Also IIRC there are no federal commercial permits for tautog.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
158 Posts
NJ had scientific evidence to support the claim that they had been fishing under a reduction vs. the state's quota already, and thus that a further reduction was not warranted. The state worked many long and hard hours arguing their case before the ASMFC. Yes, the state went to bat for its anglers, and I for one appreciate the effort. What is left to do now is to have our council convene to pass new season/bag limits that are within compliance to avoid the moratorium/minimize its duration. NJ's commercial season ended on 1/15 and does not begin again until 4/15 and MRFSS does not have wave 1 landings for tog.
 
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top